"This is a completely new, genetic type of vaccine that has been developed under great pressure, and while conventional vaccines take up to 10 years to test, this vaccine has only been tested for a few months, which could potentially pose a great risk."
Based on my challenge (The last appeal of reason) I was contacted by another expert (a trained biologist and professional medical interpreter/translator, who has been working in the field for twenty years) who prepared an article about the vaccine by compiling several professional foreign studies, renowned articles and interviews. The sources themselves are also worth paying attention to, as they contain a huge amount of other interesting information.
We're not talking about some stupid conspiracies here. This is relevant and fairly crucial information that the government doesn't mention at all in its "education" campaign.
I think people should know about them.
In my opinion, civil servants should read especially carefully, because some of them may soon be affected by the "voluntary" vaccination.
I will only add that I am in no way a vaccine resister. It has been about two weeks since we had our children vaccinated against encephalitis.
Jan Tománek
—————————————————————–
Pfizer was the first to come up with a vaccine against COVID-19 (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2). This vaccine is not yet registered, but has been approved for temporary use in the UK by the Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and the UK Department of Health and Social Care.
This is about a completely new, genetic type of vaccine, which was developed under great pressure, and while conventional vaccines have a testing period of up to 10 years, this vaccine has only been tested for a few months, which could potentially pose a great risk (i).
In the currently commonly used vaccines against viral diseases, a weakened live virus, a killed virus or possibly a part of a viral protein is used for vaccination. The production of this uses genetically modified bacteria or yeast, which serve as a kind of bioreactor for the production of this protein, and these vaccines are tested and safe.
For gene vaccines (which can be of the type DNA or RNA) However, it is different – the cells of the vaccine recipient, i.e. the vaccinated person, become the „bioreactor“. For example, some other harmless virus is introduced into the body, into which it was (for DNA vaccines) DNA from the target virus is inserted, which codes for the virus protein. This means that a piece of viral DNA is inserted into the cell nucleus of the vaccinated person, and our own cells will produce the necessary protein, on the basis of which the body will create antibodies. (ii)
This is a completely new procedure that has not been used in any human vaccine before. This procedure can, for example, affect the functioning of human cells - such cells can theoretically be evaluated as infected by our immune system and the immune system can therefore start to intervene against them. In extreme cases, it cannot be ruled out that genes related to the outbreak of tumor growth may be affected. It is possible that the vaccine is safe, but the fact is that it has not been sufficiently tested. (iii)
The Pfizer vaccine (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2), which is an RNA gene vaccine, uses modified viral RNA bound to lipid nanoparticles to induce the production of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in host cells. Our body will then respond to this antigen by producing antibodies (iv).
The Pfizer vaccine (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2) is intended for people over 16 years of age, so it is not intended for children. Its safety and effectiveness have not been studied in people under 16 years of age.
The vaccine is administered by injection in 2 doses, with an interval of 21 days between booster doses. Vaccinated individuals may not be protected against COVID disease until 7 days after the 2nd vaccination. (v)
Like all vaccines, COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 may not protect all individuals who are vaccinated. (vi)
An important fact is that there are no or limited data available on the effect of the vaccine on fertility and pregnant and lactating women, and the use of the vaccine during pregnancy is not recommended.
In women of childbearing potential, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination and such women must be advised not to become pregnant for at least two months after the second dose of the vaccine.
It is not known whether the vaccine is excreted in breast milk or not, and therefore a risk to newborns and infants cannot be excluded.
Furthermore, the effect of this vaccine on fertility is not known (vii).
As for adverse effects, they have so far been monitored for approximately 2 months after the 2nd dose, but monitoring should last for 2 years. (viii)
In Britain, 2 serious adverse reactions after vaccination with the vaccine in the form of a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction have already been reported, in two healthcare workers who were among the first to receive the vaccine. The British Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency has therefore issued a recommendation that people who have had significant allergic reactions in the past should not be vaccinated with this vaccine. (ix)
Vaccine efficacy was determined based on the presence of a positive PCR test and at least one symptom of COVID-19 (fever, new or increased cough, increased shortness of breath, chills, new or increased muscle pain, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, diarrhea, or vomiting). (x)
However, it is not at all clear, and the data to date do not even show, whether the use of the vaccine will lead to a reduction in the number of cases of severe illness or death. (xi).
It is also noteworthy that the impact of these vaccines on disease transmission is not being evaluated, so even if the vaccines were able to provide protection against COVID-19, they may not similarly limit the potential transmission of the disease. (xii)
When asked about the possibility of COVID-19 transmission by vaccinated people, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla responded that Pfizer was „not sure“ whether the vaccine prevents transmission of the coronavirus, stating that „this is a fact that needs to be investigated.“ (xiii)
According to iDnes data, the Czech Republic will very likely have to accept responsibility for any damage caused by vaccination as a condition for timely delivery of the vaccine. (xiv)
Just for comparison - in the UK, it has already been enacted that both Pfizer and other companies developing and manufacturing COVID vaccines, as well as healthcare professionals who administer the vaccine, are exempt from liability and protected from any claims related to possible adverse effects of the vaccine or problems with the vaccine. (xv)
Pfizer CEO Ben Osborn declined to answer questions from reporters at a press conference about why Pfizer was exonerated, stating, „We do not disclose any details regarding aspects of the contract and in particular any details regarding the liability provisions.“ (xvi)
Although we are assured that vaccination will be completely voluntary, so-called COVID passports are already being prepared, i.e. vaccination certificates against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which causes COVID-19, which are intended to serve the so-called benefitization, which means that they are intended to bring benefits to those vaccinated in practice and allow them, for example, to travel abroad without a negative PCR test, but in some countries, even to enter sports matches or private businesses (private businesses would thus be entitled to ask for this health information upon entry). (xvii)
These efforts have already appeared in the Czech Republic, where, for example, the chief hygienist Jarmila Rážová stated that people should be motivated to get vaccinated ( „"We do not want to introduce restrictions for the unvaccinated. The goal is rather the opposite model. Those who are vaccinated will be able to use services without undergoing tests that they could otherwise only use with regular repeated testing.".“" ) (xviii) and the Minister of Health, Jan Blatný, said the same thing during interpellations in Parliament this week. (xix)
This is therefore pressure that should take the form of both punishments (not being allowed to enter places, e.g. cinemas, planes) and benefits (not wearing a mask, etc.). This is completely unacceptable in a state governed by the rule of law and would lead to the division of citizens into two categories, which has already happened in the past and the consequences were terrible.
This approach would also result in direct discrimination against people who cannot be vaccinated for health reasons.
However, this is particularly striking because we already know a lot about COVID-19 and we also know that this disease has a mortality rate of approximately 0.3 % (xx.)
It is therefore clear that the current approach to addressing the situation is a purely political rather than a scientific decision (xxi), and we must ask ourselves whether we will continue to be controlled by fear and allow everything that previous generations have worked so hard to build to be destroyed.
Because if we do nothing, we may lose our freedom almost instantly. And part of freedom is the ability to choose and take responsibility for our own lives, which the government's approach seems to deny us.
(Full text in PDF)
Also published on the server Pritomnost.cz
————————————————————————————————————–
(i – iii) Interview with virologist Hana Zelena, MD:
https://video.aktualne.cz/dvtv/virolozka-udaje-o-vylecenych-jsou-chybne-cisla-nehraji-vakci/r~24173a16e51b11ea8b230cc47ab5f122/
(iv) Clause 5.1. (v) Clause 4.2 (vi) Clause 4.4. (vii) Clause 4.6 (viii) Clause 4.8. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/941452/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf
(ix) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction
(x) Point 5.1 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/941452/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf
(xi) https://www.bitchute.com/video/j2Nkh7djSzPf/
(xii) https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31976-0/fulltext
(xiii) https://thehill.com/news-by-subject/healthcare/528619-pfizer-chairman-were-not-sure-if-someone-can-transmit-virus-after
(xiv) https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/domaci/koronavirus-covid-19-vakcina-cesko-evropska-komise-investice-vlada.A200817_173728_domaci_aug
(xv) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html
(xvi) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html
(xvii) https://www.bitchute.com/video/j2Nkh7djSzPf/
(xviii) https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/domaci/koronavirus-rozhovor-jarmila-razova-opatreni-pes-rozvolnovani-zprisneni.A201129_144414_domaci_brzy
(xix) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYQh8ONDOnw
(xx) Point 12: http://stavbeznouze.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/odpov%C4%9B%C4%8F-106_1999-AK-Nielsen-1.pdf
(xxi) https://www.bitchute.com/video/j2Nkh7djSzPf/
You will best support my work buys books,
if you don't read, you can and otherwise....
