About how dishonesty works literally in real time.
After my live-style article „"It's not "just" a dot to Croatia"„
the server Manipulatori.cz had to respond immediately of dubious origin and even more dubious financing (even from government money...) and come again a defamatory article about me
My article – not scientific – which is actually a reflection and tries to ask questions, is still worth someone's downfall and discrediting me. At the same time, I do not draw any "unscientific" conclusions myself, I am just asking questions and of course I am not telling any lies.
And we can ask who and why it bothers us when someone asks questions that probably shouldn't be asked today.
My first "falsehood" is that I took the liberty of quoting data from the US government VAERS system. And I show their report that since the beginning of this year alone, over 6,000 suspected deaths after vaccination – which is FIFTEEN TIMES compared to other years.
Nevertheless, the Manipulators try to question the authority of the server "that it has a number of shortcomings" by linking to other dubious servers...
OK, if the US office has a number of shortcomings, it's not my problem, but it's the official system directly under the CDC... So question it there Mr. Cemper – not me! I'm just sharing freely available data from official authorities.
And my second "falsehood"? That's not my falsehood, that's what I'm quoting. „"your" Mr. Chlíbek.
And vaccinologist Mr. Chlíbek is quoted in the article and says literally:
„"Based on the latest data, according to Chlíbek, the risk of blood clots after receiving the AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson vaccines in people under 60 is 1 to 1.1. This means that if vaccination prevents a severe course of Covid-19 in one person, there is now a risk that an average of 1.1 people will develop blood clots."“
Which is what I paraphrase with the sentence:
„"Because up to the age of 60, the chance of dangerous blood clots is the same as the chance of a severe course of Covid."“
It is truly astonishing WHY and who deserves to be constantly discredited by the truth and the people who try to show it, in a way that, in my opinion, has no parallel in history.
It is a perfect method that these gentlemen did not invent, because it also works successfully abroad. Sourced links across dubious "fact-checking" servers, which, by sharing nonsense and propaganda, create the appearance of truth and guaranteed "verification" of data, but in reality do the exact opposite of the search for truth. And what is most striking, these "verified truths" of self-proclaimed arbiters are then shamelessly adopted by, for example, public media.
And I'm just a stupid writer and director for whom academic reputation is not important, but can you imagine how such an article discredits respected scientists? You still wonder why they don't speak out?
That's what you should be asking - who and why are these people paying and why are they doing this - but unfortunately people don't care!
—————————————————————–
You will best support my work buys books,
if you don't read, you can and otherwise....
