In 2018, these four letters crept into our lives - that is, "with us"... The EU created those letters for us, and those letters only annoy us and no longer fulfill their original purpose (if there really was any good purpose at all...)
The previously "maybe" (with a big question mark) godly intention has turned into toothless bullying, nonsense and depravity, which will not protect anyone and anything anyway.
On every website, you need to click off the regulation that you agree to the collection of data from your browser - but the browser stores this data anyway and no one cares.
Forget about the exhibition of children's work in kindergarten - instead of Pepiček and Anička, there are only numbers on the wall, or not even that, because after all, the child's personality could be affected if a name was given next to his picture.
What about the fact that when "something" was really happening and it was necessary to protect the important information of the child - for example, the state of health - on the contrary, the governments and the EU at the head, the entire GDPR was purposefully trampled.
The children had to tell every cleaning lady (literally) what diseases they had and didn't have and vaccinations, and the teachers entered everything into systems and spreadsheets.
But that doesn't matter - people continue to silently click on meaningless privacy texts on every website, continue to elect governments that have long done more harm than good for people, and are content and silent.
And of course, the state is the biggest violator of its own meaningless laws.
My wife recently started a business and since then we have had three offers from major banks arrive at our home address - pure spam letters to set up an account with them and two more scam letters to sign up to some dubious registries.
And what does the state do? How does he protect his citizens?
On the contrary, it is the state that publishes this data of yours and provides it to the banks. The same state that is bugging you to check customers on your website with a nonsensical sign is doing the exact opposite.
But there is actually one positive here - just like with masks and vaccinations - a perfect business for some who have made hundreds of millions from GDPR consultations, software modification, leaflet printing and other related nonsense.
You will best support my work buys books,
if you don't read, you can and otherwise....
I don't know what will have to happen in order for the majority of our population to stop behaving like a herd.
It's unbelievable how most people accept the mainstream and don't even bother to find out
think how they are manipulated
In addition, violations of the GDPR - especially eRecept - collect sensitive and most sensitive health data about you in a national register, and you have no option to express your disagreement with this - except by boycotting the entire healthcare industry and treating yourself anonymously with aspirin...
About those Cookies, which are probably not part of the GDPR, but it's similarly bullying nonsense: Some people click "I understand" _because_ they don't understand anything. Because the main thing that violates your privacy when agreeing to Cookies is the need to click on it, because someone somewhere keeps a list of what websites you read, and whether you read them or a robot that doesn't click on it. (Because the "I understand" click is usually outsourced to some central cookie consent registry where they keep statistics... Because normally the giga-scumbag Google keeps them for you, but they envied it and wanted such statistics too...) (I usually, before I would click it off them with one click, open Inspect Element and remove it from that page in five clicks, and I do it every time I load it, or I enter a DNS block for that outsourced spying system, which only prevents that centralized spying... Some websites do it themselves, that's a bit fairer, but some people are lazy about it...)
And they introduced it, among other things, because then they can distinguish whether a person is reading it, whom they can lie to with impunity, and not a robot that would archive their lies and allow them to contradict it in retrospect...
The news server should not be able to distinguish whether it is read by a Reader or archived by an independent Archiver...
πα½