On December 9 last year, ČT broadcast the program Máte slovo, where she refused to let the previously invited lawyer Jindřich Rajchlo in as a guest, who immediately drew attention to this on your Facebook.
He also commented on this topic in interview for the program Incorrect.
I will just remind you that this censorship intervention, as Jindřich Rajchl talks about it, was directly under the pressure of Professor Šeb (one of the guests - a big supporter of compulsory vaccination) and probably also directly from the Ministry of Health.
The ČT Council received a number of complaints about this broadcast due to its absolute imbalance and incorrectness (you can watch the recording here).
And now, this Wednesday, the Council finally decided, rather surprisingly:
"The Council notes that presenter Jílková did not tell the truth..."
"The Council took the position that the presenter had grossly violated the Czech Television Code of Conduct."..“
The full text of the statement
In Prague on May 18, 2022
Dear Master,
On May 18, 2022, the CT Council dealt with your complaint about the program Mát slovo broadcast on December 9, 2021 on CT1. Since the council received more complaints about the program in question, the council evaluated them and divided them into the following four areas: 1/ Influence on the selection of guests
2/ The false statement of Mrs. Michaela Jílková that JUDr. Rajchl was invited to the audience, but did not come of his own free will
3/ Censorship of text messages sent by CT viewers during the program Máte slovo
4/ Violation of the principle of maintaining objectivity on the part of ČT, where the complainants point to the gross tendency and imbalance in the conduct of the discussion by the presenter of the program, Michaela Jílková.
1) The Council states, that on this point, it cannot issue a decision on the legitimacy or unlegitimateness of the complaint. The matter goes beyond its normal monitoring capabilities when processing complaints and the Council does not have the means, which, for example, a court has, to check — who, when, how and with whom exactly communicated, since this is the complainant's claim against the claim of ČT. It is not within the Council's capabilities to assess whether the change in the case of inviting JUDr. Rajchl was decided by the program's programmer himself and Prof. Šebo only "warmed up his soup of importance" in the communication, or whether the change was actually made based on the intervention of Prof. Šebo.
2) The Council states, that presenter Jílková was not telling the truth when she told the viewers: "Mr. Rajchl was invited to the audience. I was looking forward to him. It's his business that he didn't come." This statement by the presenter is in direct contradiction not only to what JUDr. Rajchl claims, but also to the statement of the program's programmer.
There is no doubt that JUDr. Rajchl was in the gatehouse CT before the filming of the program, he demanded entry and was not allowed in. That this was not a misunderstanding is clear from the statement of the dramaturg Smrž, which he sent to the Council, which reads: "So both Mr. Mareček and Mr. Rajchle, aware that they were not included in the discussion in the studio, deliberately came to the reception that evening to obtain "compromising" material, which they planned to share with other vaccination deniers in support of their political goals, they actually did not want to participate in the program on the evening of December 9, 2021."
3) Dramaturg of the show rejected the claim about censorship of incoming SMS and stated in a statement to the Czech Television Council: "All SMS from viewers that do not contain vulgar, racist or xenophobic views will reach the screen and will arrive on time. Only due to great interest and a high number of messages, they may not reach everyone. There was extraordinary interest in the topic of mandatory vaccination from SMS senders during the autumn peak of the epidemic."
In order to be able to better assess this issue, the Council decided to request statistics from the management of ČT, which will show the number of all received non-vulgar, non-racist and non-xenophobic SMSes that came during the broadcast of the program in question, as well as the number of SMSes displayed.
4) The Council took the position that that the presenter has grossly violated the Czech Television Code of Conduct. Specifically, Article 5.14 (“Editors of Czech Television must act in such a way when appearing in news and current affairs programs that the viewer cannot recognize their opinion on the matter they are reporting on).” And this despite the fact that she herself CT She described this episode as a program that should be approached "cautiously" because the chosen topic of the coronavirus epidemic is "accompanied by gross manipulations of public opinion."
The council substantiates its opinion with, for example, the following sentences that were heard in the program:
Jílková: "Are you going to let experts answer your disinformation?", "Where do you get the certainty that you, with your education, understand the world more than the two professors here?", "Why do you think you are right when you don't have the education for it?"
This interview of Mrs. Jílková with the head of the Vinohradská hospital Zeman is also proof of the violation of the principle of impartiality of the moderator:
Jílková: "Doctor, I beg you, you don't work in the intensive care unit." Zeman: "But I worked there."
Jílková: "No, you're not there now."
Zeman: "I'm not there now, but do you think I can't imagine it?"
Jílková: "No, probably not."
Based on this violation of the Code, the Council asked the General Director of ČT to inform the Council of the consequences he drew from the above findings, both towards the authors of the report and directly towards JUDr. Rajchl.
On behalf of the Council of Czech Television, with kind regards
M.Sc. Pavel Matocha
Chairman of the Council of Czech Television
You will best support my work buys books,
if you don't read, you can and otherwise....
Do you still remember this scandal from the program Mát slovo, when the covid authority dictated to Czech Television who it could invite to its program to discuss covid measures, and who it could ban from television?
The tradition of servility and pre-shitness of Czech journalists continues. The monotonous chatter of two vaccination fanatics Prymula and Chlíbek in a discussion about the covid era on news interrupted the moderator with a shameful confession of a mainstream press officer, uttered naively between speeches in the middle of the hour-long discussion: "We invited, or wanted to invite, for example, Mr. Jiří Beran to the studio, but you [Prymula] didn't want to talk to him about it here in the studio." (at 30:07 min.)
In short, the great Mr. Prymula did not want to discuss with someone who would disrupt the official interpretation of covidotyranny too much according to the official interpretation and instructions of the WHO. Therefore, he ordered the journalists from Novinky that if they invited Prof. Beran, he would not come to their studio. And our "independent" journalists again willingly bowed their heads and went out of their way to accommodate the covidofanatic, and instead of the "problematic" Beran, they invited his friend Colonel Chlíbek so that they could echo each other.
The incriminated screen from the discussion here
These TV shows – Mát slovo, Otázky Václav Moravec, Partie – what kind of people watch it?
Lobotomies 😛
This program should be called "Slovo má Jílková", not Máte slovo. ČT should be financed from the state budget, so that it is possible to monitor the use of funds. This is not currently the case. And the viewer should choose whether and to whom to contribute. Today they call it the Concessionaire's contribution, but this contribution is simply a tax, because it is imposed by law.
Do not trust the government, avoid all mass media (ČT, CNN, Seznam, Idnes…..).
The truth is constantly under attack, read independent (alternative) news while you still can!
Good day,
unfortunately, Cht really lies and does not provide objective information. I can imagine the pressure I was subjected to, Mrs. Jílková. But Mrs. Jílková, I do not accept the measure of guilt.