Are ocean levels really rising...? Or, how journalism is done today

A few days ago I posted this on Facebook and again it didn't even take 48 hours and the mainstream had to rush in with an "explanation" again... (article in the Daily)

And even more perfect was the text on Manipulators, where Master Cemper really outdid himself… Yes, facts really matter… 😉

Since Covid, it's been the perfect litmus test for when you hit the nail right on the head. And paradoxically, I didn't even try to do that here...
I was never really interested in the topic, but now I couldn't help it. On all wikis + from all scientists you will learn that the sea rises 3-7mm every year (different "true" sources have different numbers, however) - and according to these "scientists" you will find out that in a hundred years the sea should have risen by 10-30 cm...
But the funniest thing is that I tried to find a photo that would prove it. Thousands of people have taken hundreds of thousands of photos of the coast, over more than 150 years, but imagine that not a single one shows the uplift.
And the best "proof" of a circle is what these "scientists" and the media will say when you show them a photo that it's not like that. They say it's inconclusive because of different camera angles, different tides, inaccurate measurements...
So, to summarize and underline – I searched, but I couldn't find ANY photos where the lifting was visible... yet "scientists" claim it and it's the consensus and the only truth...
However, all PHOTOGRAPHIC evidence AGAINST sea level rise (and there is some) is "inconclusive hoaxes".
Simply – don’t ask – it is NOT RELATED, but it protects and is safe…

By the way, a similar story was recently shown by Czech Television, which, for example, shared it over the course of several years COMPLETELY OPPOSITE article by "scientists" how The Gulf Stream is unstoppably stopping…

And this denigration of anything that doesn't fit has continued in EXACTLY the same script since COVID. - Some of their posts mature like wine, not here, for example, they actually tried to "disprove" one of my posts, which, imagine, "calmed down a lot of people" during the covid era. I was such an asshole in 2020 and I still am...

But let's show you how today's "journalism" is done.
Any sources, own work, get your ass out of the editorial office? Forget it!
Today, for such a "job", you only need one mass communication graduate from Charles University, in addition to AI - one Krupka.
And when a scandal happens, all that is needed as "proof" for Master Krupka is the statement of the party behind the scandal. And that's it, and we have at least 3-4 articles cooked up from it, discrediting other people who dare to MENTION anything else.

In this case, for example, the Elysée Palace said it IS a handkerchief, so it simply IS a handkerchief. PERIOD!
For example, did the “journalist” Krupka raise his ass and perhaps try to confront Macron, did he make a magnification himself, analyze the video, or asked other journalists who were there for more footage or perhaps asked them? And I'm not even talking about any questions about that spoon (which we won't talk about)... Any other sources? Doubts, questions? NO – forget it, absolutely zero!
For today's journalist, simply assuring the representative of the "perpetrator" that it was not so is more than enough! - Of course, it must be the "right" perpetrator from the "right" party and of course pro-European!
Absolutely incredibly shameful journalism, which really has nothing to do with journalism and its principles and is only the mouthpiece of a system completely out of control.
And that's exactly what the system has always needed Krupkas to do, who do exactly the dirty work and then falsely accuse others...

...and this is how we live with the media.