How truth is cooked and reality manipulated

24 views

It first dawned on me after September 11 that things were not quite right with our "Western" world, and I have now fully understood this, with all its consequences, thanks to Covid.
Dividing the world into good and bad is just a fiction – I'm afraid they are just bad and even worse...

What about the fact that no skyscraper in the world has ever collapsed as a result of a fire, what about the fact that office building number 7 fell "by itself" even though no plane has ever hit it, what about the fact that buildings do not spontaneously collapse in free fall.
And as one physicist wrote – either the American commission of inquiry is right or Newton and his laws. Both are simply not possible.
Although there is countless irrefutable evidence that September 11th could not have happened as officially presented, that there are several thousand architects and engineers who know that physics simply must always apply to everyone (https://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE/)
Still, is anyone interested in finding the truth? I mean, the real truth and not the mainstream one – the "permitted" one?
I don't think so, because if a person admitted it, it would severely shake their entire value system.

I don't know where the real truth is, but I know that something stinks terribly in the "official" one - in fact, it's exactly the same situation as today with Covid.

I think that was exactly when the now-popular word "conspiracy" entered the public sphere, supplemented by the word "disinformation". On the other hand, it is actually quite humanistic, so that the bearers of the opposing truth do not have to disappear or be killed, they are simply ridiculed and labeled conspirators. In addition, a few stupidities, real lies and hoaxes are deliberately released into the public sphere, and the truth is then so tangled that no one is interested in looking for it and people prefer to accept the generally presented one. It is easier and, above all, so much more convenient.
And as we know – he who owns the media owns the truth.

Don't you believe that the exact same thing is happening here right now? A few recent examples that are just the tip of the iceberg.

1) What is on Wikipedia is true...
First, we need to look at who the arbiters of truth are in the Czech Republic. We have several of these arbiters.
For example, the server Manipulatori.cz is completely run by one uneducated person (Jan Cemper) with a secondary technical education, who quite seriously "fact-checks" scientific articles by experts, doctors, and professors from many fields and claims on his server what is and what is not true.
And another server (Czech Elves) is a bunch of anonymous students, teachers, firefighters... (as they present themselves on their website) who sign anonymously as a group without any expertise - only as fantasy beings...

But there is no problem with that at all, it is democracy – let everyone write whatever they want. The problem is only that these organizations receive grants from the state for their „activities“ and have contracts with Facebook and other organizations so that these organizations can refer to them and say what IS and what IS NOT true „according to experts“ and they can delete and censor the inconvenient ones… And that is exactly how it works abroad – only these organizations are much more sophisticated and not so Czech-smeared.

MY BOOKS ABOUT FREEDOM AND THE TIMES WE LIVE IN


Animated image with bounce effect

And these dubious sites are then used purposefully as sources of information, for example on Wikipedia. So all you have to do is write in a Wikipedia article that someone is sharing hoaxes and untruths, for example about Covid, refer to these dubious servers as sources, and suddenly that person – who is otherwise a renowned and cited scientist – is labeled a „disinformer“ thanks to these amateur missteps, and it can even ruin their career.
Not to mention granting all possible antitheses to the guaranteed TRUTH…

Look at the posts for yourself and where those quotes about disinformation lead...

https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Pirk
https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiř_Beran_(epidemiologist)
https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soňa_Peková
https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthy_forum

Yes, unfortunately it is that easy and that's how "truth" works on Wikipedia, Facebook, YouTube...
For example, YouTube is already censoring Czech media - specifically the CNN Prima News program, which YouTube labeled as disinformation on our channel and banned.
https://www.facebook.com/zdraveforum/posts/333225978593947

And such a "truth" can be easily exploited to later censor not WHAT, but WHO.
For example, this interview with Dan Landa disappeared from YouTube within 12 minutes as medical misinformation - even though he doesn't say a word about anything medical.
https://nastub.cz/w/3dpDakUKxUjgUaujtEmEQD

2) The nonprofit will do an „unbiased“ evaluation…
The non-profit organization takes this and prepares an evaluation according to its own "rules" - in government procurement, this is called a "tailor-made offer".

For example, now, well before the elections, a so-called election guide will be created on the Reconstruction of the State server.
https://www.volebnipruvodce.cz

20210910 reconstruction of the state of Hodnocení
It's funny to look at the individual boxes and their markings.
While lockdowns, tests and other pirated Covid support programs are rated a 1, ending the unnecessary pandemic, bugging people, repealing pandemic laws is rated a 5 here... And I could continue like this in any category.
It's similar to fact-checking servers - THEIR OPINION is presented as GENERAL TRUTH and here as research.
It would be better if the server directly wrote who IN THEIR VIEW is good to vote for and who is not, and didn't forget to add who actually pays these non-profits and why they do it...

3) Tailor-made research and its impact in public media
A very good tool is also to create a boundary within which I will invite parties, for example to election debates, which are key for the parties from a media perspective. While Nova and Prima will invite 8 parties, Czech Television decided to invite only 7 subjects and is still guided by its own research, which it commissioned from Kantar.
It is funny that the now completely discredited Green Party, which had less than one percent in "regular" polls all summer, is now presented in the poll as a party with a beautiful "electoral potential" of 7 %, and similarly the party of another "one man" Příšava - 9.5 %. While other parties are deliberately underestimated.

20210910 kantar ct
https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/domaci/3365720-nejvyssi-volebni-potencial-ma-koalice-spolu-ukazal-odhad-kantar-cz-a-data-collect

I have no idea if it's really all just a coincidence and a certain collusion of people who think they're helping, or if it's really such an elaborate system that it can really be compared to the mafia, which still perfectly covers itself and passes it off as democracy and the fight for freedom.

I think it's time for many people who naively think they live in a democratic system to seriously think about what and who they actually serve...

You will best support my work buys books,
if you don't read, you can and otherwise...
.

Upozornění na e-mail
Upozornit na
guest

0 Comments
Nejnovější
Nejstarší Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments