Compensation for safe vaccines

On October 14, the European Parliament prepared a special document with the reference number B9-0475/2021, entitled:
Draft resolution of the European Parliament on the establishment of a European Fund for Compensation to Victims of COVID-19 Vaccination.

——————————————————————–
European Parliament,

– having regard to Rule 143 of its Rules of Procedure,

A. whereas the European Medicines Agency already lists approximately one a million cases of adverse reactions after vaccination COVID-19 vaccines:

– 435,779 cases for the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine,
– 373,285 cases for the AstraZeneca vaccine,
– 117,243 cases with the Moderna vaccine,
– 27,694 cases with the Janssen vaccine

B. whereas these side effects are sometimes serious; whereas serious neurological effects reportedly occurred in approximately 75,000 people after vaccination with the Pfizer vaccine;

C. whereas the European Medicines Agency reports that COVID-19 vaccines have led the way in the European Union to the deaths of approximately 5,000 people:

– 4,198 cases for the Pfizer vaccine,
– 1,053 cases for the AstraZeneca vaccine,
– 392 cases with the Moderna vaccine,
– 138 cases with the Janssen vaccine,

D. whereas the European Commission negotiated the purchase contracts and did not want pharmaceutical laboratories to be held liable; whereas MEPs did not have access to the contracts during the negotiations;

1. Calls on the Commission to establish a fund to compensate victims of COVID-19 vaccination;
2. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the Member States.

——————————————————————–

So much for an official document.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2021-0475_CS.html

It is quite strange that the European Parliament has prepared a resolution on compensation for "vaccination victims", when according to our "experts" and the government, vaccines are safe and tested, there are almost no side effects and no one dies...

I will just add that the official "underreporting" of adverse drug effects is generally around 95% - meaning that only around 5% cases are reported.
This means that you can multiply all these numbers roughly 20 times.

Here, the statement of SÚKL directly speaks of underreporting of 95% (That is, out of 100 cases, only 5 are reported)
https://www.sukl.cz/sukl/reakce-na-vyjadreni-lekare-vystupujiciho-v-poradu-epidemie
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16689555/
https://www.tribune.cz/clanek/35530-podhlasenost-nezadoucich-ucinku-po-aplikaci-vakcin

So to sum it up, people would collect tax money from each other (because pharmaceutical companies are contractually exempt from all liability) to compensate each other for officially non-existent harm.

PS.
And where are our journalists?